Originalism is the legal doctrine held by some fascist judges to incorrectly justify decisions they say violate the original meaning the Founding Fathers intended in the US Constitution, as if those old boys were prophets for the modern era descending from Mt. Sinai with the God’s commandments. Never mind that those old boys could never have imagined many of the issues that would preoccupy us in 21st century US. Never mind that many of those old boys were slaveowners who believed they were the new American aristocracy. (How else could they have proposed the creation of the US Senate, basically an institution that copies the useless British House of Lords?)
That “f&^%ing moron” awaiting six trials (three state, three federal) loaded SCOTUS with sympathetic fascists. The US would be in danger of having the country run by Il Duce from a jail cell if those and the other fascist judges he named weren’t in his pocket, but at least the country’s worst president in US history can’t pardon himself in the three state indictments. Like Al Capone, maybe they’ll get Narcissus le Grand on tax charges! And if the fascist SCOTUS judges have any backbone, they could always fall back on the 14th Amendment!
A MAGA majority in SCOTUS (six of the nine judges are MAGA fascists) are self-proclaimed originalists when convenient, or lean toward originalism. So…let’s test them! Let’s have them read the 14th Amendment of the Constitution and deny its clearly stated meaning, indeed its past, present, and future meaning that’s a lot clearer than the 2nd Amendment (only idiots can believe militias are a single person and therefore a rightful gun owner!): Donald J. Trump cannot even run for president because of the 14th Amendment, let alone hold the office again, because he fomented a rebellion and encourage insurrection against the US government!
Okay, that was added after the Civil War to prevent southern secessionists, AKA traitors of the US, from holding public offices. (They were the murdering SOBs who still motivate people like the Jacksonville hater to commit their hate crimes!) The 19th century Civil War was a rebellion against the US government, but that’s exactly what Trump tried to pull off! He’s disqualified from holding federal office just as much as any southern traitor during the Civil War. There are no hairs to split here, ye old fascist judges on SCOTUS! The 14th Amendment’s meaning is absolutely clear. You can’t parse it and weasel out of this one. All we need is some states’ attorney generals to take the case to the court (New Hampshire’s is thinking about it). Last time I checked, there are more blue states than red states, and the former have a lot more population to back them up in any future civil war.
You might tell me to shut up because I’m no constitutional scholar. Sorry to ruin your rant. A good number of constitutional scholars have already made the same statement about SCOTUS needing to pay attention to the 14th Amendment, and all of them can claim to know the Constitution a hell of a lot better than Alito and his fellow fascist SCOTUS brownshirts! The fascist SCOTUS judges will thumb their noses at them, of course, because they only fall back on originalism when it’s convenient. Their failing the test I propose will still show what fascist SOBs they really are (okay, there’s one DOB who’s a religious wacko). And that will also prove is that originalism is just a bunch of legal BS that has no place in modern times!